AI vs. the Fortune 100


Change careers, start an AI company

Last week, we looked at CEO and C-suite leaders in the AI 50 to see how many of them have a history of making significant career changes.

76% of the AI CEOs had at least two different kinds of careers before starting their current companies. Interesting but maybe not surprising, since CEO-founders tend to be a non-linear bunch.

More contrary to conventional wisdom is that 64% of other AI C-suiters also have major career changes in their past. They are HR leaders who spent years in product or engineering, ops leaders who are former founders, tech leaders who are former academics, and lots more.

This week, in part 2 of our 4-part series on career changers and incremental growers, we're looking at leadership teams from legacy enterprises to see how they compare. (Subscribe here if you're not already.)

The Fortune 100 is not a monolith

I thought C-suite profiles from the Fortune 100 would make an interesting comparison point with the AI 50, since legacy enterprises are known to attract different kinds of leaders. More pragmatically, I had already collected useful structured data about the Fortune 100 since one of my clients is working on an (unrelated) data story about them. Practicality FTW!

Sure enough, compared to the AI 50, Fortune 100 CEOs and their C-suites are a more conservative bunch when it comes to career change.

Only 17% of Fortune 100 C-suiters have made significant career shifts, compared to 38% of their CEOs. Both of those numbers are much lower than their equivalent rates in the AI 50.

Within the Fortune 100, though, not all industries are the same. Companies in the tech and healthcare sectors have leadership teams with more varied kinds of experience than all other industries.

Tech tracks as an outlier, but healthcare was a bit of a surprise to me. Is that connected to the fact that healthcare is growing at a faster rate than most of the other segments? Could well be.

On the whole, though, AI leaders have more varied career experiences than Fortune 100 execs. On the face of it, this makes sense. Career changers have sought out new kinds of work in their own professional lives, so they may be more likely to gravitate to industries that are less well-established too.

Next up: Are career changers more likely to hire other career changers?

So far, we've seen that AI companies are more likely than established enterprises to be led by career changers. But are career changers more or less likely to hire other career changers? Next week we're diving into that data in installment #3. (Get the whole series and subscribe here.)​

Kieran


Whether you're growing steadily or changing careers, I can help you grow. My coaching clients include startup CEOs, C-suite execs, and ambitious leaders inside large organizations, all leading with founder-level clarity, urgency, and ownership. Ask me about becoming a client!​

​My latest data stories | Build like a founder | nerdprocessor.com​

kieran@nerdprocessor.com
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

nerd processor

Every week, I write a deep dive into some aspect of AI, startups, and teams. Tech exec data storyteller, former CEO @Textio.

Read more from nerd processor

Where are they now? One of my great joys is serving as a job reference for people who did awesome work at Textio over a long period of time. Jobs are temporary, but the relationships you build on the job can last your entire career. As a leader, there are few rewards like seeing your former team go on to accomplish amazing things after working with you. Even better if they're accomplishing those amazing things together with people they met on your team. Some companies have especially strong...

Operator mode Back when I was raising money for my company, I grouped investors into two groups: realists and dreamers. Realists made our idea smaller by finding all the reasons it would fail. Dreamers made our idea bigger by imagining category-bending ways to apply it. In time, I grew to appreciate both personas. But as a dreamer myself, I'll admit that I was more drawn to the dreamers. Especially early on when our ideas were new and fragile. I've spent the last few years working as an...

3-2-1 vote A few weeks back, I wrote about why deciding team values is not a democracy. This week, I want to talk about something else that is often treated as a democracy, but shouldn't be: marketing. No one thinks you should decide your data architecture, your security posture, or your pricing model by employee vote. But when it comes to messaging, brand, and storytelling, suddenly everyone's an expert. Curiouser and curiouser Early on at Textio, I worked with an engineer who had...