Every week, I write a deep dive into some aspect of AI, startups, and teams. Tech exec data storyteller, former CEO @Textio.
Share
The 2024 Presidential election in 3 maps
Published over 1 year ago • 2 min read
I'm no Steve Kornacki, but here's a map
Actually, it's three maps!
For fun, last week I bootstrapped a small but super-current social media corpus to bring you three fun maps. I looked at LinkedIn posts last week from 100 political superposters in each US state. State by state, I mapped out positive and negative sentiment in social posts about Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Kamala Harris, respectively.
Naturally, all three politicians are the subjects of several positive and negative posts in all 50 states and Washington, DC. I wanted a simple way to map the most prevalent statewide sentiment about each one, so this is how I labeled things:
Very positive: >70% of the collected posts from the state are positive
Somewhat positive: 55-70% of the the collected posts from the state are positive
Neutral: Sentiment in the collected posts from the state is a balanced mix of positive and negative (within the 55/45 threshold in either direction)
Somewhat negative: 55-70% of the the collected posts from the state are negative
Very negative: >70% of the collected posts from the state are negative
I find election season stressful. Mathing on some data is my way of coping with stress. Welcome to a very special episode of nerd processor that stands outside our usual content arc! (But if you like simple, accessible data stories, you should totally subscribe because I write this kind of thing often.)
All the caveats
My methodology is probably flawed. Are LinkedIn users more likely be to red or blue? What about political superposters? What makes a superposter, anyway? (In this case, it's someone posting about politics at least weekly for the last 12 weeks.) Did I sample correctly? Are most superposters in cities, which tend to vote more Democrat? How will it look a month from now, when people are discussing something other than the Trump assassination attempt and the Democratic nomination process? All totally reasonable questions.
Then again, this methodology may not be significantly worse than what your favorite news outlet is showing you. So let's take a look!
Joe Biden
If I had sampled posts from three weeks ago, this map might have looked even redder. At that time, most posts about Biden commented on his viability as a candidate or on the specific decisions he was making as President. Last week, though, most posts about Biden were about his overall tenure as a public servant and/or his decision to step off the ticket. These tended to be more positive than the posts a month back.
Sentiment of social posts about Joe Biden, 7/20-7/27
Donald Trump
Here too, the map might have looked slightly redder if I'd built it a month ago. Last week, many of the Trump posts talked about the assassination attempt. Posts on this theme have mainly been sympathetic.
Sentiment of social posts about Donald Trump, 7/20-7/27
Kamala Harris
As you might expect, the volume of posts about Kamala rose sharply last week compared to a few weeks back. This is common sense, but I'm mentioning it because the map visualization does not make this clear on its own, and it feels relevant. A sitting Vice President gets less attention on social than the presumed nominee in the national Presidential election.
Sentiment of social posts about Kamala Harris, 7/20-7/27
The bottom line
Taken in aggregate, Kamala posts are significantly more positive than Biden posts. In fact, Kamala post sentiment is neutral or positive in several states that have generally been Trump strongholds such as Texas and Florida. Plus, a few traditional swing states (Arizona, Nevada, Ohio) that are negative on Biden are positive on both Trump and Kamala.
These patterns are especially notable because circumstances from this past week ought to make both Biden and Trump as sympathetic as possible to their respective bases. But the sentiment in these maps makes it look like both Southern states and several swing states that looked like automatic Republican winners are very much in play.
That said, I'm no election prognosticator, and 14 weeks is an infinity of time in election season. November will show how well these maps hold up.
You are probably a weird special case too Last year, I published a lot of data about the job market and the experience candidates were having (getting ghosted a lot). But I didn't share much about my own recruiting experience. I started a new job just before Thanksgiving. I wrote about my role, as well as some others I'd considered, when I first announced it. This week, I wanted to share some data from my job search. I was a long-time founder and startup person who was interested in seeing an...
You can't outsource having a point Every once in a while, I hear someone announce that they have a goal of doing more thought leadership. For a long time, I didn't understand what this meant. Magic decoder ring to the rescue: "I want to do more thought leadership" often means the person wants to write articles, often on LinkedIn but sometimes elsewhere, that make people believe the author is smart, forward-leaning, and inspiring. More often than not, it actually means they want someone else...
You say spam, I say data set Across all four professional email addresses I used in 2025, I got a lot of random cold email: 5,122 messages in all from 229 distinct vendors trying to sell me stuff. In fact, I get so much cold email that I wrote about it: they're not all about AI, but after ChatGPT launched, the percentage of total pitches trying to sell me AI went through the roof. You probably get these messages too. If you're like most people, you hit the unsubscribe button, block the...