35% of candidates get ghosted after interviewing. Yikes.


Ghosty McGhosterson

Remember when I collected data from 288 job seekers to figure out who gets called back for the jobs they apply to? On average, people get more recruiter calls when they're in their 30s, working in tech, and looking at in-person roles.

Over the last three months, I've gone deep with 30 job seekers who meet this description. These are the people getting the most calls when they apply to open roles. As a group, they have applied for nearly 1,000 roles since October 1, 2024. Today, 21 of them are employed and 9 are still looking.

In that time, they have collectively completed 144 full interview loops, or 4.8 per person. And get this: After 51 of these interviews, these job seekers have been completely ghosted by the company interviewing them.

Yes, you read that correctly!

That's right: 35% of the time, the candidate goes through a full interview process, with recruiter screens and technical screens and an entire onsite or virtual interview loop, spending many hours with numerous people across the hiring team, only to never hear from the company again. 35% of the time!

I'd like to say I'm shocked about this, but I'm not.

Story time: The last time I applied for jobs in the broader market, it was early 2014. I had decided to leave Microsoft, but hadn't yet decided to start Textio. I didn't know what I wanted to do, and I spent a month talking to everyone I knew who was doing vaguely interesting work.

In the end, I applied for 6 roles. These 6 applications led to 5 full interviews and 3 offers. But for 2 of those interviews (40%!), I still haven't heard back 11 years later -- though one of the hiring managers did eventually apply for a role at Textio.

Who gets ghosted?

The 30 job seekers I'm focusing on have generally done well in the market. These are in-demand professionals who are moving from application to screen to interview loop to offer at impressive rates. Sure, some recruiters and companies have better follow-through than others. But, by and large, this is a successful group with solid offer rates, and they're still getting ghosted after 35% of their full interview loops.

What's going on here?

#1: Recruiters are more likely to answer short messages

A few months ago, I analyzed 1,100 sales emails to see which ones got a 90% response rate and which ones got ghosted. Messages that are short, direct, and skip the long-winded cheerfulness get higher response rates. The same patterns apply here, at least when the candidate is writing to a recruiter.

On the other hand, if the candidate is writing to the hiring manager rather than the recruiter, longer messages perform better. In more than half of the cases where candidates ultimately received an offer, they took the time to send the hiring manager an in-depth followup after the interview loop.

#2: You're more likely to get ghosted when your interview panel is enormous

This one hurts. Companies that include more people in their interview panels are also more likely to ghost candidates after the loop.

Why is this happening? My theory is that the more people who are included in the panel, the less obvious it is to panelists who owns candidate follow-up. Whatever the reason, the more onerous the process, the less likely it is for a candidate to hear back after completing the process. Depressing, right?

Team Success Hacks

My favorite exercises for building high-performing and connected teams. Ready for your next team meeting, no big budget... Read more

#3: Women are ghosted 1.5x more often

Spoiler alert: It's 2025, and work is still sexist.

Controlling for the other factors above, women are 1.5x more likely to be ghosted after full interview loops than men are. All the fuss that tech companies have made about hiring women in engineering looks like kind of a sham.

Recruiter and hiring manager gender don't make any difference to these patterns. This is a small data set, but the patterns are clear.

If you're curious, there are no non-binary people among the 30 candidates I tracked, and race and ethnicity have inconclusive findings.

Don't ghost, Captain Obvious

The bottom line: Hiring teams, if a candidate is spending this many hours with you, the least you can do is get back to them. Your industry is not that big and people have long memories. But also, maybe you can just be a decent person and get back to candidates because it's the right thing to do.

May all your applications have amazing response rates, and may all your roles be filled. Here's to more great data stories in 2025!

Kieran


Did you like this nerd processor? Help me keep these stories broadly available for everyone to access by leaving me a tip. Thank you!

My latest data stories | Tell your own Viral Data Stories | nerdprocessor.com

kieran@nerdprocessor.com
Unsubscribe · Preferences

nerd processor

Every week, I write a deep dive into some aspect of AI, startups, and teams. Enter your email address to subscribe below!

Read more from nerd processor

The most magical place on earth I had 90% of a nerd processor draft finished last week, on a piece called How to break your team spirit in three acts. But then I took our 15yo and her best friend to Disneyland for a few days over spring break, and as I sat down to finish the newsletter, my heart honestly wasn't in it anymore. Maybe another time. But right now as I write this, I'm sitting by the pool with a mocktail while my kid and her friend are going on roller coasters in the park, and I'm...

Nine-year itch Since I graduated from college, I have changed careers in a meaningful way every nine years. I was an academic until I craved something more applied. I was a product and engineering leader in BigTech until a reorg caused me to think hard about what I wanted. I was a startup CEO until I stepped down for a break last year. I have generally enjoyed my jobs and I didn't plan any of these moves. In all three cases, I didn't know what I wanted when I made the change. At the end of...

The image generation Two weeks ago, I asked ChatGPT's new image generator to use everything it knows about me to generate an image of me at work. It gets a lot of details right! And ONE ENORMOUS FUNDAMENTAL PART extremely wrong. ChatGPT's image of me at work After I wrote about this on LinkedIn, over 1,500 people sent me their own images. Some people used something other than ChatGPT's new image generator for their images, and others didn't send me the system's explanation of its assumptions....