New data: After 3+ career changes, people get a lot more opinionated


A change is gonna come

Over the last three weeks, we've looked at career change patterns among executives. We saw that most CEOs and C-suite leaders of the AI 50 have changed careers several times, while Fortune 100 execs have changed much less often. We also saw that, among execs, career changers are more likely to hire other career changers, and that execs hired in the last 12 months are more likely to be career changers than in previous years.

This got me curious about two things:

  • We've looked extensively at executives, but what about everyone else?
  • Do career changers show up differently in public?

This brings us to the last installment of our series on career changers.

250 career changers walk into a bar

Last week, I ran a poll on my LinkedIn asking people to share how many different career eras they've had. A career era is a period of time when you're doing basically the same kind of work for basically the same type of organization. For instance:

  • If you've been an academic, a software engineer, and a stay-at-home parent, that is three eras
  • If you've been an account executive at three different SaaS startups, that is one era
  • If you've been a product marketer at Microsoft and Google and a startup founder, that is two eras

You get the idea. For this article, I snapped the data after 250 people participated in the poll. As you can see, the vast majority of respondents have changed careers several times.

Several people asked if age makes a difference. After all, older people have been in the workforce longer and have had more time to do different stuff. And yes, age matters! But the thing I'm interested this week is not how many people have changed careers. It is whether career changers talk differently than everyone else. I used this poll to look at that question.

For everyone who replied, I grabbed their last 12 months of public LinkedIn posts. That's the data set for this story!

I was curious whether career changers showed up differently in their posts. I analyzed the language in everyone's posts according to several factors:

  • Preferred topics
  • Corporate content vs. personal content
  • Original content vs. reposts
  • I vs. we language
  • Overall sentiment (optimistic, pessimistic, or neutral)
  • Post metadata (length, frequency, engagement patterns)
  • ... lots of other stuff

In a couple of significant respects, career changers showed up differently.

Career changers are more opinionated

I classified all posts into three sentiment buckets: optimistic, pessimistic, or neutral. Lots of posts are neutral in sentiment; think webinar announcements, factual commentary, data shares, and so on.

I found that most people across most career change profiles are equal parts optimistic and pessimistic. But once people have had at least three career shifts, something interesting happens: they get a lot less neutral.

People who have had just one or two career eras stay neutral most of the time. By contrast, the career changers spend half their time showing clear optimism or pessimism in what they choose to share.

Career changers show the mess

Because we have to bring AI into everything these days, I wondered if one group was more likely to talk about AI than everyone else. Nope. Everyone is banging on about AI more or less indistinguishably. Lolsob.

But I did find major theme differences in the posts from people with three or more career shifts behind them. People who have changed careers more often talk more openly about their failures and mistakes. They are also far more likely to talk about learning and experimentation, which I found fascinating.

Visualizing the themes with a word cloud is illuminating. Below you can see some examples of language used in posts from people with 3+ career eras. They use the smaller font words just about as often as everyone else. The larger the font, the more often career changers use those words compared to everyone else.

Most of us will change careers at least once

I'm a career changer myself, and I've always been partial to hiring other career changers. This was particularly the case when I was leading an early-stage startup. But I started this series with the POV that there are two ways to build a great career, and I stand by it.

There is a lot to be said for incremental growers, who spend years becoming world-class at their jobs. They build deep expertise brick by brick, execute consistently, and rise through the ranks to senior levels. As we saw in the C-suite data, many of the best incremental growers go on to be successful and influential enterprise executives.

At the same time, career changers bring a tremendous range of experience. Provided they stay put in each career era long enough to meaningfully learn, their broad curiosity is a huge professional asset. This is good news, because the data shows that most of us will change careers at least once in our professional lives.

Kieran


Did you enjoy this series? Want to tell data stories of your own? Viral Data Stories 101 helps you get started.

​My latest data stories | Build like a founder | nerdprocessor.com​

kieran@nerdprocessor.com
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

nerd processor

Every week, I write a deep dive into some aspect of AI, startups, and teams. Tech exec data storyteller, former CEO @Textio.

Read more from nerd processor

Where are they now? One of my great joys is serving as a job reference for people who did awesome work at Textio over a long period of time. Jobs are temporary, but the relationships you build on the job can last your entire career. As a leader, there are few rewards like seeing your former team go on to accomplish amazing things after working with you. Even better if they're accomplishing those amazing things together with people they met on your team. Some companies have especially strong...

Operator mode Back when I was raising money for my company, I grouped investors into two groups: realists and dreamers. Realists made our idea smaller by finding all the reasons it would fail. Dreamers made our idea bigger by imagining category-bending ways to apply it. In time, I grew to appreciate both personas. But as a dreamer myself, I'll admit that I was more drawn to the dreamers. Especially early on when our ideas were new and fragile. I've spent the last few years working as an...

3-2-1 vote A few weeks back, I wrote about why deciding team values is not a democracy. This week, I want to talk about something else that is often treated as a democracy, but shouldn't be: marketing. No one thinks you should decide your data architecture, your security posture, or your pricing model by employee vote. But when it comes to messaging, brand, and storytelling, suddenly everyone's an expert. Curiouser and curiouser Early on at Textio, I worked with an engineer who had...